Burdett A. Loomis, Editor University of Kansas July 2001 History and Congress/History of Congress: The Growing Use of Historical Evidence in Congressional Studies |
| Any serious student of Congress has realized that
over the past 15 years, but especially the past five, increasing numbers
of first-rate historical studies of congressional politics have been published,
both as important articles and as major books. This is a significant trend,
for several reasons. We learn a good deal more about an institution we
thought we knew; we can test theories developed in one era in another (or
several others); and we can consider new theoretical possibilities based
on new understandings of individual behavior and institutional structure.
The scholars who write in the following pages have thought seriously about the implications of using historical data, of retesting old hypotheses, of formulating new ones. In an era when professional historians seem to have abandoned political history, congressional scholars are clearly taking up the slack. On a case by case basis, the results of this scholarship encourage us to rethink various parts of our conventional wisdom about the Congress. More generally, however, these scholars and their like-minded colleagues are virtually requiring that an entire subfield of American politics think about the institution of the Congress in different ways than we often have in the past. The cross-fertilization of research techniques, theoretical perspectives, and data collection will energize the study of congressional politics for a long time to come.
Contents of this issue: Doing Congressional History
Talking About Madison While
Thinking About Perfect Waves at Black's, or Some Thoughts on the Trials
and Rewards of Doing Historical Research on Congress
Congressional History: New
Branches on Mature Trees Anvil or Wellspring? The Use
of History in Legislative Studies Revisiting the Pre-Reform House
Making Congressional Studies
Dynamic: Comparing Across Time Picking Fruit in the Historical
Garden
|