features timely, peer-reviewed articles on contemporary politics written for the informed, general reader and commentary and debate on major issues in the political science profession. Other
sections are "The Teacher," a dedicated section for articles on pedagogy and teaching, and “The Profession,” a section with articles on and about the political science discipline.
also serves as the association's journal of record.
Articles in PS
are organized into three thematic areas (Politics, The Teacher, and The Profession). All content is peer-reviewed and is expected to adhere to social scientific research standards.
Politics articles have original research content and should be targeted to a broad audience of political scientists and general readers. Articles need to adhere to the PS
length restriction of 3,650 words, inclusive of all notes, references, and tables (supplementary materials may appear in an online Appendix).
Articles in “The Teacher” section include research on teaching and pedagogy within the field of political science. Articles in this section must include not just an interesting idea or innovation in teaching, but also a systematic assessment of the learning objectives, or a detailed description of the teaching resources, materials, and methods for implementing the innovation.
Articles in “The Profession” section include research articles on the political science profession and higher education; research and commentary on graduate and undergraduate training; articles on political and social science research; and reflective essays on mentoring
Special review procedures are used for special content areas, and this content is published within one of the three PS sections.
Individuals wishing to submit a set of articles for a symposium or to organize a group of scholars on a topic should first review the PS Symposium: Guidelines for Proposals
and, after reviewing these guidelines, consult with the editors. A proposal should include the theme and prospective authors (i.e., list of contributors, abstracts, and statement of goals, audience, and suitability to the journal). The editor may also invite authors to submit articles addressing a single theme or question. Invited articles are also subject to the review process.
Spotlights are a set of short, timely articles on a topic of current political or social import. Spotlight articles are short (1,000 words) and with no or a bare minimum of citations, tables, and figures. Please contact the editorial staff if you are interested in organizing a Spotlight.
“From the Sections” and “Reflections”
“From the Sections” contains articles that have been nominated by section newsletter editors and are deemed of sufficient importance and interest to be disseminated to the entire discipline. The level and type of peer-review is determined in consultation with newsletter editors.
“Reflections” provides authors an opportunity to submit non-anonymized essays on mentoring, research, graduate and undergraduate education, or other reflections on your experiences in the profession. These articles will be sent out for peer-review. Please contact the
editorial staff if you have ideas for reflective essays.
Manuscript Preparation Guidelines
Manuscripts should be double-spaced and formatted for 8 1/2" x 11" paper and should not exceed 3,650 words in length, including references, endnotes, tables, and figures. (A web-based appendix is available for supplementary and supporting material.)
- Manuscripts should include in-text citations that will correspond with endnotes and references. Endnotes and references should conform to the Style Guide and the Chicago Manual of Style, 16th edition.
- Gender-specific pronouns used to refer to members of the profession or to society at large should be avoided.
Manuscripts submitted for possible inclusion in the "front" of PS
(Politics, The Teacher, and The Profession) may be submitted at any time. Accepted and revised manuscripts are customarily printed in the next available issue, themes and page count permitting.
Submitted manuscripts are subject to a blind, peer-review process of approximately 2 to 3 months. Authors must submit their manuscripts through the journal's online manuscript processing system, Editorial Manager, found here: www.editorialmanager.com/ps. Please do not submit your paper as a PDF document. The Editorial Manager system builds a PDF document from the Microsoft Word files you submit, which ensures the file's anonymity. New authors will need to create an account within the system before submitting their manuscript, including an ORCiD. The author's or authors' name(s) should appear only on a separate cover sheet. The first page of the text should include the title of the manuscript. Language within the text that might identify the author(s) should be removed. See specific guidelines.
Specific Guidelines for Submission to Editorial Manager
When submitting a manuscript through the online Editorial Manager system, the authors need to have the following information available:
- three keywords that describe the manuscript;
- a cover letter available to upload or cut-and-paste;
- an abstract of no more than 150 words;
- the number of words in the manuscript (not to exceed 3,650);
- the number of figures and tables; and
- a blinded manuscript in Microsoft Word.
Keywords and classifications describe the content of your manuscript. The keywords should designate which subfield(s) of political science your work falls into, as well as any particular aspects of your submission. The classifications indicate areas of research specialization. These terms are standard among the APSA and its journals. After you have made the classification selections, choose the Next button to continue.
Blinding your manuscript is very important. In Editorial Manager, when answering the question about a paper's anonymity, consider the following to avoid your submission being returned to you prior to review.
- Do your names appear on the title page or in the header or footer areas? If so, remove them before submitting the paper.
- Does the paper refer to your previous work in the text of the manuscript using phrases such as "in my earlier work (Smith 2004)," or "in our 2003 article on ... we"? Revise these. Such self-references do not comply with the double-blind peer-review process.
- Have acknowledgements been included with the version submitted for review that indicate specific grant numbers, your conference presentations, or other easily recognized background details that would reveal your identity to the reviewers?
Reviewers. You also have the opportunity to specify reviewers whom you suggest or oppose. This page can be filled in naming those who possess the particular background to assess the submission, or others who you believe cannot fairly assess the work. After uploading your manuscript, make sure you view it in both pdf and html before logging out of the system.
Manuscript Processing and Production
Upon submission, the editors make an initial judgment about the suitability of the manuscript for publication in PS. Suitable manuscripts are sent to a minimum of two reviewers. After reviewers make their recommendations, the editors reach a final judgment. Every effort is made to limit the review process to three months.
If the editors, based on the recommendations of the reviewers, feel that the article would benefit from revision the author(s) will receive a letter from the editors asking the author to revise the article as outlined by the reviewers and to resubmit it for further review by the editors and, perhaps, other reviewers. The author(s) has six months from the date of this letter to resubmit a revised version of the article. Revised and resubmitted articles more than six months old will not be considered for publication in PS.
When accepted, authors are asked to submit a revised, unblinded, final copy of the manuscript in Microsoft Word (no other formats are permitted). The final copy is copy-edited and returned to the author for final approval. All changes and revisions are incorporated into the manuscript electronically and submitted to the compositor for to create proofs. A statement transferring copyright from the author to the American Political Science Association is necessary before proof/ production.
One set of page proofs is sent to the author. Corrected page proofs should be returned to the managing editor within two (2) days of receipt of the proofs. Every effort should be made to limit corrections to typographical errors. Fees charged for other changes will be the responsibility of the author.
Charges apply for all color figures that appear in the print version of the journal. At the time of submission, contributors should clearly state whether their figures should appear in color in the online version only, or whether they should appear in color online and in the print version. There is no charge for including color figures in the online version of the Journal but it must be clear that color is needed to enhance the meaning of the figure, rather than simply being for aesthetic purposes. If you request color figures in the printed version, you will be contacted by CCC-Rightslink who are acting on our behalf to collect Author Charges. Please follow their instructions to avoid any delay in the publication of your article. Note: other requirements for table and figures regarding resolution and formats will be provided should your manuscript be accepted for publication.
Submit manuscripts through the online system at: www.editorialmanager.com/ps
Submit questions to: [email protected]