SUSAN BURGESS NOMINATION
Greg Kasza, Indiana Univ.,
Martha Ackelsburg,
Scott Barclay,
David Barrett,
Jane Bayes,
Mary Bellhouse,
Gerald Berk,
Mark Blasius,
Pamela Brandwein,
Marla Brettschneider,
John Brigham,
Wendy Brown,
Peter Brusoe,
Darlene Budd,
Keith Bybee,
Sean Cahill, National Gay and Lesbian Task Force
Lief Carter,
Cornell Clayton,
Stacy Clifford,
Lisa Conant,
Barbara Cruikshank, University. of
Fred Dallymar,
Sue Davis,
Sue Davis,
Jodi Dean,
Lisa Disch,
Christine DiStefano,
Jeffrey Dudas,
Charles Epp,
Michaele Ferguson,
Louis Fisher, Congressional Research Service
Steven Gerencser,
Emily Gill,
Howard Gillman,
Edward Goerner,
Sheldon Goldman,
Leslie Goldstein,
Judith Grant,
Frank Guliuzza,
Steven Haeberle,
Rodney Hall,
Christine Harrington,
Roger Hartley,
Laura Hatcher, Southern
Mary Hawkesworth,
Stefan Heumann,
Catherine Holland,
Bonnie Honig, Northwestern University
Ronald Hunt,
Patrick Jackson,
Kathy Jones,
Vince Jungkunz,,
Nancy Kassop, SUNY-New Paltz
Timothy Kaufman-Osborn,
Christine Keating,
Thomas Keck,
Sally Kenney,
Donald Kommers,
Liane Kosaki,
Sonia Kruks,
Valerie Lehr, St. Lawrence University
Gary Lehring,
Jill Locke,
Harvey Mansfield,
Lori Marso,
Nancy Maveety,
Amy Mazur,
Wayne McIntosh,
Joshua Miller,
Patricia Moynagh,
Julie Novkov,
Susan Olsen,
Ido Oren,
Timothy Pachirat,
Paul Passavant,
Hector
J.
Doris Provine,
Daniel Reagan,
Phyllis Rippey,
Joe Rollins,
John Roos,
Alisa Rosenthal,
Donald Rosenthal,
Lloyd I. Rudolph,
Susanne Hoeber
Rudolph,
Austin Sarat,
Peregrine Schwartz-Shea,
Samer Shehata,
Helena Silverstein,
Anna Marie Smith,
Daniel Smith,
Verity Smith,
Holloway Sparks,
Susan Sterett,
Sherrill Stroschein,
Kathleen Sullivan,
Barry Tadlock,
Raymond Tatalovich,
Jeffrey Tulis,
Sharon Whitney,
Keith Whittington,
Juliet Williams,
Elizabeth Wingrove,
Cyrus Zirakzadeh,
Karen Zivi,
Catherine Zuckert,
STATEMENT OF PURPOSE
As an outstanding scholar of
The re-legitimation
of qualitative research has made great strides, but there remains much to be
done if qualitative work is to achieve parity in hiring and promotion
decisions, in the graduate curriculum, in the editorial policies of regional
association journals, and in the governance of APSA. Competitive elections are an important means
to further reform.
Perhaps the most disturbing
aspect of the longstanding shift toward quantitative research and formal theory
is that it occurred without public debate.
The election of APSA’s officers should give
political scientists an opportunity to discuss such matters, but ordinarily it
does not. We challenge the official
slate for the APSA Council not to protest the particular choices of the
nominating committee, but to challenge the system of appointments itself. Ironically, the professional association
devoted to political science is alone among major academic associations in
its failure to select its council members through regular competitive
elections. In addition to being undemocratic, the lack of
competitive elections robs members of an opportunity to participate
actively in the association by engaging in a robust discussion of the many
issues which confront us in the profession.
Susan Burgess is a staunch
advocate of competitive elections. Her
research, which ranges from an interpretive analysis of constitutional debates
over the War Powers Act to the study of parodies of the judiciary in popular
culture, exemplifies the creativity and methodological pluralism that
Perestroika espouses. She has a long
record of leadership in women’s studies and on matters related to the status of
gay, lesbian, bisexual, and transgendered scholars in
political science. Finally, she hails
from a “comprehensive” university (one that gives the M.A. but not the PhD in
political science), which has been the most underrepresented type of
institution in APSA’s executive posts.
Please
join the 108 signatories who have endorsed Susan’s candidacy and give her your
vote for the APSA Council.