Burdett A. Loomis, Editor 
University of Kansas 
January 2003
 

New Perspectives on Representation

 


 

As my reasonably lengthy and largely enjoyable tenure as editor of Extension of Remarks draws to a close, I thought that a reconsideration of democratic representation might make for a fitting finale.  In more than a quarter century of thinking about legislatures, the idea of representation remains perhaps the core idea to which I continue to return, whether focusing on individual legislators, party leadership, campaigns and elections, or organized interests.

 

The seven articles included in this edition of Extension of Remarks employ various frameworks and methods to get at the idea of representation.  Several bring in a comparative perspective, both across nations and the American states.  The Internet comes into play, as does the growing strength of partisanship within the district activities of American House members.  Institutional design reflects another recurring theme, whether in broad electoral reforms or term limits in the American states.  And representation, we are reminded, can take place within the bureaucracy as well as in legislatures.

 

In the end, there is no “solution” to the “puzzle” of representation.  Rather, we need to take the idea seriously and understand, as best we can, the implications of the choices we make in designing the institutions that serve us.  Representation will continue to afford legislative scholars a cornucopia of opportunities to the nuanced and changing relationships between office-holders and citizens – the core of democratic practice.

 


Contents of this issue:

 

Parties in the District?

Christian R. Grose, Lawrence University

 

Representatives and Constituency Effort:

Homestyle Goes Abroad

Garry Young, George Washington University

 

Political Representation and the Internet:

Whither Responsible Party Government?

Thomas Zittel, Center for European Studies, Harvard University; Mannheimer Zentrum fuer Europaeische Sozialforschung (MZES)

 

Opposition, Representation and the “Second Game”

Carolyn Forestiere, Emory

 

Term Limits and the Representation of Women

Krista Jenkins and Susan J. Carroll, Rutgers University

 

Democracy, Herterogeneity and Representation:

Explaining Representational Differences Across States

Benjamin G. Bishin, University of Miami

 

Common Ground: Links Between Bureaucratic

and Legislative Representation

Jill Nicholson-Crotty, Texas A&M University


Contributions to "Extension of Remarks" are encouraged. The total length of such contributions should be four pages, text typed, single spaced, with references following the style of Legislative Studies Quarterly. Works may be edited for content or for length. Please send proposed contributions to Burdett A. Loomis, Department of Political Science, 504 Blake Hall, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-2157.


Members may go to  http://pub37.ezboard.com/blegislativestudiessectionhuge69973 to post comments on the Bulletin Board for Extension of Remarks.

 
| Front Page | Research & Teaching | Legislative News
| Papers Presented | Journal Articles | Book Notes | Extension of Remarks

| Other Editions of the LSS Newsletter | |Announcements|
| Legislative Studies Section Home Page | APSA Home Page |